Written by Jody Segrave-Daly, RN, IBCLC
As a veteran NICU, nursery nurse, and lactation consultant, I have cared for and fed thousands of babies over the past 30 years. When working in the special care nursery, babies are fed according to their weight and cumulative losses to determine their caloric requirements for intake amounts and optimal nourishment. For example, term babies admitted to the NICU from complications of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) are immediately fed based on their weight, usually about 60-80 ml/kg/day (typically 15-30 ml) every 2-3 hours. Newborns fed 15-30 ml will likely have their insufficient feeding complications stabilized and demonstrate feeding satisfaction and comfort because the newborn stomach is at least four times larger than what is taught.
First, we should review the anatomy of the newborn digestive system.
Gastric emptying is a continuous movement into the small intestine which accommodates milk volume to be more than 5-7 ml every 2-3 hours. The stomach is a muscular and very stretchable organ. Its biological function is to expand to hold food and fluids while churning with digestive enzymes before entering the duodenum or small intestine. A full-term baby swallows 500-1000 ml of amniotic fluid every day. Ultrasound can confirm the stomach’s size and measure when the baby swallows amniotic fluid. The newborn stomach does not magically or suddenly grow after day one as taught to parents. My concern as a long-time NICU nurse, infant feeding specialist, and IBCLC has always been why mothers are taught their exclusively breastfed newborn baby’s stomach capacity is only 5-7 mL on day one, which is false.
The Myth of the Newborn Stomach Size: Where Did it Come From?
I started my research with my non-clinical hat on and turned to Google since this is where my patients typically go first. When I did a Google search for newborn stomach sizes, there were over 868 thousand links! I was led to a plethora of visual images depicting newborn stomach size. Some of the most popular images were the belly ball models that lactation consultants wear on their lanyards so they can visually educate new mothers about how big their ‘newborn’s stomach size is.’
I was in absolute disbelief knowing our most trusted lactation consultants were selling, wearing and using, proudly I might say very inaccurate, dangerous and non-evidence based tools that are used in hospitals. I quickly began to understand that ‘belly bead’ models are lucrative merchandise to sell!
Clinical hat back on, I dug into the science behind these belly balls. In the 2008 Journal of Human Lactation, I found a published article that revealed a completely different utility for belly ball models.
Marble/ball models are often used to represent newborn stomach capacity; however, their accuracy has not been determined:
“Measurement of infant stomach capacity has been attempted for over 100 years. Exact volumes cannot be standardized, but data suggest that anatomic stomach capacity and physiologic stomach capacity vary widely.” In addition, “It is important to note that because a wide range of feeding volumes on day one (1-20 mL) and day three (13 to 103 mL) has been reported, and the reasons for these variances are unclear, it may be best to simply acknowledge that feeding volumes vary widely and like stomach capacity, do not lend well to the visual representation given our current knowledge.”
This research was published in the Journal of Human Lactation and yet, not a single lactation professional is practicing what the evidence says. How can this be?
Despite that qualification, new moms are inundated with images where there are a series of bottles filled with milk depicting the size of an infant’s stomach according to each day after birth, sometimes compared with fruit or different-sized marbles and balls. A mother sent this picture to us, which was in her hospital room after the birth of her baby. She also received inaccurate education about the newborn stomach size and thought her formula-fed baby only needed 5 ml at each feeding.
I continued to search for more resources, and I found research in 2013 from Nils J. Bergman who published this study, which says:
“There is insufficient evidence on optimal neonatal feeding intervals, with a wide range of practices. The stomach capacity could determine feeding frequency. A literature search was conducted for studies reporting volumes or dimensions of stomach capacity before or after birth. Six articles were found, suggesting a stomach capacity of 20 ml at birth.”
According to Dr. Bergman, “There is reasonable consensus on the amount of milk that human term newborn infants need per day, figures given vary from 150 to 160 mL/kg/day.” This means that an average 3 kg or 6.6 lb newborn requires 450-480 mL or 16 ounces of milk a day. At 66 Calories/dL, this would roughly be 100-106 Cal/kg/day, which is the published daily caloric requirement for a newborn. This total volume can be given in smaller volumes more frequently or larger volumes less frequently, 2 ounces every 3 hours or 1.3 ounces every 2 hours.
His article poses the hypothesis that the feeding interval should be 20 mL every 1 hour, assuming that the stomach empties only once every hour.
However, the real-life clinical application of his suggested feeding interval would quickly lead to maternal and newborn exhaustion from lack of sleep and increased risk of postnatal depression, breastfeeding cessation, and even suffocation from a mother falling asleep with her newborn during breastfeeding. In addition, his feeding interval does not take into account that the stomach actually empties during feeding and therefore the feeding capacity of a newborn is higher than 20 mL. The clinical expertise of neonatal health professionals has shown that even one-day-old newborns are able and do comfortably tolerate 15-30 MLS per feeding.
Additional newborn stomach size research
Most popular breastfeeding education resources for new parents also refer to inaccurate information by teaching the stomach size is 5-7 ml on day one. This picture is from a mother who delivered in a Baby-Friendly Hospital this week. Imagine her confusion when her baby required additional amounts of supplementation to treat hypoglycemia.
Dr. Gomez, a neonatologist, explains why hypoglycemic babies (low blood sugar) need more than 5 ml of milk despite being told their baby’s stomach can only hold 5 ml.
“We don’t have any strong evidence as to the size of the stomach for each baby. However, we do have significant scientific evidence that hypoglycemia and under-hydration cause damage to the brain of the infant.
We have solid evidence that feeding babies 10-20 mls when they are born is adequate to keep the blood glucose levels up in most babies. Some will still need some other interventions, but 10- 20 ml feedings are enough most of the time.
There is no evidence that feeding 10 to 20 ml of milk to a baby causes “stretching of the stomach,” and we don’t have ANY evidence that this is detrimental to the baby.”
We have evidence that judicious supplementation helps babies and does not impact breastfeeding rates.
So the question is, are we hurting babies by supplementing? NO. Are we hurting babies by not supplementing and allowing them to have hypoglycemia or dehydration? YES.
According to the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Supplementation Protocol, they suggest exclusively breastfed babies are fed 2-10 ml per feeding, and they reference the infant’s stomach size according to outdated studies (1992 and 1920) to reflect intake volume. They also say there is no definitive research available and the amount of supplement given should reflect the normal amounts of colostrum available, the size of the infant’s stomach, and the age and size of the infant. The fluid and caloric intake on day two post-birth should be higher than on day one in relation to the infant’s caloric demand. Based on the limited research available, suggested breast milk intakes for healthy, term infants their feedings should be based on satisfaction cues despite their guidelines. Unfortunately, this information contributes to additional confusion that already exists for parents. What they do say is research is necessary to establish evidence-based guidelines on appropriate supplementation volumes for specific conditions and whether this varies for colostrum versus infant formula.
But why don’t we already know this if an infant feeding protocol has been implemented in hospitals? Protocols are supposed to be peer-reviewed for scientific accuracy.
Speaking of HUNGER cues and feeding your baby to satisfaction, here are signs that your newborn baby needs immediate attention:
We have been talking about the newborn stomach size but What about calories? How many calories do human milk, infant formula, and colostrum contain in 5-7 MLS?
What research tells us is :
- Mature breast milk averages around 20 calories per ounce (~30 mL)
- and infant formula contains 20 calories per ounce as well.
- Colostrum is lower in fat and carbohydrates and comes in around 17 calories per ounce (~30ml) (Guthrie 1989).
How many calories do term newborns need to ensure Cell Survival?
Why do some babies tolerate fasting before the onset of copious milk production and other babies do not?
Some exclusively breastfed babies are fasting after birth if they are not receiving enough colostrum. 1 in 5 new mothers can experience delayed onset of copious milk production from various risk factors. This puts these babies at risk for developing complications from insufficient colostrum intake while breastfeeding.
1 in 71 exclusively breastfed babies are rehospitalized for life-threatening complications from insufficient colostrum intake. As lactation and neonatal medicine professionals it is imperative to update our educational resources and identify the babies who may need timely supplementation before the onset of copious milk production. For mothers who desire to exclusively breastfed, donor milk should be made available for them to use if supplementation is needed. In order for babies to receive the full benefits of breastfeeding, they need to be safely fed at every feeding.
So how often should exclusively breastfed babies eat?
There is no single correct answer to this question because each baby has a different weight and unique caloric requirement. Babies should be fed by their hunger cues and to satisfaction along with other clinical observations such as excessive weight loss, low blood sugar, excessive jaundice, or dehydration. We have a feeding plan that you can follow to determine how well your baby is feeding.
If your baby is crying and crying after breastfeeding, an immediate medical exam is necessary to be sure the baby is not suffering from insufficient intake of colostrum while exclusively breastfeeding. If a medical evaluation is not immediately available, especially before the milk has come in, supplementation may be urgently needed before medical evaluation is available to feed your hungry baby, to prevent serious complications of insufficient feeding.
A mother writes: “Because of this stupid belly bead, my baby was discharged from the hospital despite not eating enough breastmilk. He had a seizure at home and was taken back to the hospital by an ambulance for dehydration.”
As you can see, It’s time to ban the false belly bead models and update our breastfeeding education resources immediately. Our babies are counting on us to keep them well-fed, meeting their metabolic needs with sufficient milk and using the best and most current infant feeding practices possible. Too many babies are being harmed by this flawed product.
Was your baby harmed by the belly bead lanyard product?
- To file a formal complaint about the belly bead lanyard company, click here.
- If your baby was harmed from insufficient feeding related to this lanyard, click here for legal counsel.
- To report the belly bead lanyard to the FDA for a faulty medical device used in a hospital, click here to MEDWATCH online voluntary reporting form
Normal Newborn Anatomy and Function | High Impact® Visual Litigation Strategies™
(Blog Updated February 6, 2022)
If you need infant feeding support, we have a private support group– Join us here.
Are you a healthcare professional and want to join our advocacy? Click here to join us!
How To Prepare For Supplementing When Breastfeeding Your Baby In The Hospital
Legal Consultation on Breastfeeding Complications Resulting in Disability
Dear Parents, Did You Know Just 2 Teaspoons Of Supplementation Can Protect Your Baby And Your Breastfeeding Journey?*
Baby-Friendly USA Acknowledges Their Mistakes; Are They Going To Make Real Changes In The New Year Or Are They Providing Lip Service To Mothers?
Additional research about the newborn stomach size:
The Pediatric Surgery Journal describes the newborn stomach anatomy, including the size of 30 ml at birth:
Pediatric Anatomy Surgery Journal
Normal third-trimester fetal anatomy -ultrasound videos: the abdomen:
Guthrie, Helen Andrews. Introductory Nutrition. St. Louis : Times Mirror/Mosby College Pub., 1989
Breastfeeding confidence and measurement of milk intake
Newborn feeding recommendations and practices
The American Academy of Pediatrics’ Breastfeeding Guidelines
Helpful guide to safe infant feeding amounts from the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Helpful overview of infant feeding for the first month of life, from the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Feed Your Baby—When Supplementing Saves Breastfeeding and Lives
Normal Human Lactation; closing the gap
HOW YOU CAN SUPPORT FED IS BEST
There are many ways you can support the mission of the Fed is Best Foundation. Please consider contributing in the following ways:
- Make a donation to the Fed is Best Foundation. We are using funds from donations to cover the cost of our website, our social media ads, our printing and mailing costs to reach health providers and hospitals. We do not accept donations from breast- or formula-feeding companies and 100% of your donations go toward these operational costs. All the work of the Foundation is achieved via the pro bono and volunteer work of its supporters.
- Share the stories and the message of the Fed is Best Foundation through word-of-mouth, by posting on your social media page, and by sending our resources to expectant moms that you know. Share the Fed is Best campaign letter with everyone you know.
- Write a letter to your health providers and hospitals about the Fed is Best Foundation. Write them about feeding complications your child may have experienced.
- Print out our letter to obstetric providers and mail them to your local obstetricians, midwives, family practitioners who provide obstetric care, and hospitals.
- Write your local elected officials about what is happening to newborn babies in hospitals and ask for legal protection of newborn babies from underfeeding and of mother’s rights to honest informed consent on the risks of insufficient feeding of breastfed babies.
- Send us your stories. Share with us your successes, your struggles, and everything in between. Every story saves another child from experiencing the same and teaches another mom how to safely feed her baby. Every voice contributes to change.
- Send us messages of support. We work every single day to make infant feeding safe and supportive of every mother and child. Your messages of support keep us all going.
Thank you so much from the Founders of the Fed is Best Foundation!
Jody and Christie
18 thoughts on “The Newborn Stomach Size Myth: It’s not 5-7 mL”
I have been an NICU RN for more than 30 years… never have I seen a stomach in all the X-rays I have seen that only hold 2-5 cc…babies have been drinking amniotic fluid for 8 months…that is how they pee….so very glad to see you approaching this topic
It seems to me that all of these studies fail to take into account what babies can and will take in naturally at the breast. Blowing up bellies with balloons until regurgitation is induced, ultrasounds and autopsies, don’t give a realtime assessment of what is normal. I recall a study done in Belarus showing average intake over the first 24 hours of breastfeeding was 37 ml and intake varied from 0-20 ml per feed. The fact is that hospital births and routines and policies are artificial environments and alter greatly what is normal and physiological. Perhaps using cherries as a visual representative of the size of a baby’s stomach is not accurate when compared to these artificially obtained volume studies, but it DOES accurately represent what some studies have shown to be normal intake at the breast.
Those studies showing that an average exclusively breastfed baby takes 37-60 mL the first day of life measured those values because that is the maximum a mom can produce on the first day. It means that mothers actually don’t produce the number of calories a newborn needs to feed all their living cells and not experience fasting physiology. That is the reason why breastfeeding mothers all over the world before the WHO used prelacteal feeding, either the milk of wet nurses, sugar water or animal to supplement their newborns the first day of life to prevent starvation. That is the reason why most exclusively breastfeed newly born babies are crying by the second night. Because they are in fact hungry, if not, starving. There is no evidence the giving birth in a hospital or artificial “interventions” are the sole causes of insufficient or delayed breast milk production. The majority of causes are physiologic stresses like blood loss the reduce milk production. Physiologic stress and low blood pressure prevent milk production because mothers would not have the fluid and caloric surplus to give up. One day old babies in clinical experience easily take 20-60 mL in one feeding because the feeding volume is not limited by the stomach size because it is not a blind pouch but a tube. The stomach empties during feeding into the small intestine and fullness is actually determined by the release of hormone signalling satisfaction. Furthermore, the stomach size does not actually change from day 1 to day 3 that quickly as well as feeding capacity. The small stomach theory is derived from the belief that a mother’s milk must be the exact amount a baby needs, which is not true.
I just wanted to verify that the individual who wrote this article is in fact an IBCLC? I was unable to find her in the registry?
Bambi Jody Segrave-Daly, RN IBCLC
Regardless of stomach size, I would think we could all agree that we should follow what nature has modeled for eons.
Maybe the stomach is larger than 5 or 10mL if filled to capacity, but maybe nature has a reason for not filling it.
Adult stomachs can hold way more than we should eat.
The human race generally thrived for thousands of years without measuring and arguing about stomach capacity, by what was available: breastfeeding & wet nursing.
I believe it makes sense that we should model infant intake based on the physiological norm. And the physiological norm for humans is what normal, healthy breastfed infants take in.
The goal is to have healthy babies, and this generally produces the healthiest babies.
The safe physiological norm is to meet the metabolic requirements of a newborn infant, which accord to the WHO is 100-110 kcal/kg/day, the amount required to prevent starvation. That equals 5.5 oz/kg/day or 2.5 oz/lb/day of breast milk or formula. Forcing an infant to endure days of underfeeding, letting them cry it out to maintain exclusivity can result in starvation-related complications like hypoglycemia, dehydration, hyperbilirubinemia and hypernatremia. Furthermore, the feeding capacity is not limited to the fixed stomach volume because the stomach empties during a feeding in response to internal signals of hunger and satisfaction which promotes peristalsis when the infant is hungry and slows when the infant is full. Therefore, newborn infants whose mother’s milk comes in by day 1 or 2 can and do feed on their full requirement, which is about 60 ml every 3 hours. Western exclusive breastfeeding advocates have a misguided obsession with exclusivity, biological purity and avoidance of supplementation that have saved millions of babies from starving when breast milk is not enough. That is why we shed light on the lies parents are being fed by such advocates the force their babies into hospitals and cause brain injuries that result in long term disabilities.
Comments are closed.